Any chance to read it on the arXiv?
On track to a standard model My commentary on Graziano et al, on consciousness models.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02643294.2020.1731443#.Xmf37Vuua6A.twitter …
-
-
-
Yes because although
@SciHubUpdated would allow to get it it's illegal
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
Consciousness is the concrete process happening in me right now, independent of how it is characterized. ”Qualia” is a bad theoretical concept, but consciousness surely exists.https://twitter.com/JylkkaJussi/status/1237480721561894918 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Idea - Compare notes is a complex task. Its all about model technical stuff. For instance. y = model(X+model2(yt)) where X is the input and yt the target. The model then knows from the start what the target is and can adapt. Loss is low but generalization is bad. Improvement?
-
Is this Hofstadter's strange nested self-referential loop?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
$44 is a little expensive for a third world guy interested on everything you have writen about just for curiosity. Is there a way I can get it for free?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.