That's a pretty awesome line from the best ombudsman the Times ever had.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm old enough to remember when the problem with blogs was the lack of editors.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Exactly,
@nytopinion was working to dilute the attention given. Why, apparently the paper is not going to say.
End of conversation
-
-
-
The NYT got rid of its pesky public editors to evade accountability in situations just like this. The model shifted from ads to subscribers, and they must continue to dispense that sweet sweet resistance porn.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@gtconway3d what was your role? - Show replies
-
-
-
Ah, competition.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The writer for
@NYTObits should be writing for@nytopinion Clear, concise and informative:https://twitter.com/nytobits/status/1173105678816350209?s=21 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do Baquet and/or Bennet have connections to Jeffrey Epstein? Maybe someone has power over them via compromising information.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.