I heard that the judge said that giving the name did not violate attorney- client privilege
-
-
-
correct. But now the Twitterverse is demanding to know what the representation was about
-
In which they don’t have to right to know because it’s not their business
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dan, did
#SeanHannity have an obligation to disclose to viewers he had a professional relationship with#Cohen - or is that simply a courtesy to viewers?#AskingForAFriend
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Well let’s just see.... it’s too bad they lie so much.pic.twitter.com/CZMsFGETLO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you think he should have disclosed it when he was defending him on his show?
-
Only if he had an ounce of a moral compass
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe people wanna know bc night after night Hannity goes in front of millions of people and misleads them. IMO he had no business covering the Cohen stories knowing what we know today. It’s a clear conflict of interest and misleading
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Correct he's not on trial. But, Sean as a personality on TV, has an obligation to tell his viewers he's a "friend"/client of Cohen. Since he didn't, there should be discipline from his employer. That said, we have no right to know the details & the govt has NO right to demand it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@seanhannity said that he never retained, never received a bill from, never hired but had a few occasions in which he asked him a question. Does this amount to A/C privilege? If so, how? No money changed hands.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its the appearance of impropriety. He was bias and that is an injustice to his viewers
-
Interesting how the appearance of impropriety only matters as long as it isn’t a liberal or liberal supporter.
#ClintonCrimes#Comey#Rice as examples
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think as a journalist and I use that term sarcastically he should disclose if he is involved in business and/or friendship if he’s reporting on Cohen and trump. Just more scum bag reporting on hannity’s part and faux news!
-
I know. It's almost like Sean has no morals by commenting all over about the Cohen raid, and how unfair it is for trump, without ever disclosing he's a client too! ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well if Hannity didn't pay for Cohens legal service, doesn't he not have attorney client privilege? Hannity is insisting he never retained or paid Cohen
-
I heard he’s saying maybe I gave him 10 bucks. LOL
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I respect you Mr Abrams, but you're wrong here. Hannity had a conflict of interest. He's on a national channel to millions defending and praising Cohen while he's viewers think he's being "objective" to the story. He had game. He had something to protect.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.