@danabrams @law_newz "Maybe" and "worried", doesn't mean anything. More than enough reasonable doubt in his case, still a tragedy imo.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@danabrams@law_newz Can't wait until@ZellnerLaw proves his innocence while simultaneously proves your ignorance#MaM#irresponsiblemediaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@danabrams The issue isn't guilt innocence. It is whether guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@danabrams@law_newz he said maybe..not supposed to convict on a maybe!!#ReasonableDoubt remember that?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@danabrams@EdAsante77@law_newz I think the jury convicted on "probably", not "maybe" or "possibly"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@danabrams@law_newz Headliner does NOT fairly represent Strangs comment in context. -
@danabrams@law_newz I really wish I could understand why folks allow themselves to end up looking like they're misleading readers
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@danabrams@law_newz He doesn't disagree, he goes with reasonable doubt. He is not saying he is guilty.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@danabrams@law_newz ... Of course He's guilty... This is just to get everyone worked up for tvThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.