Umm You have every right not to like me and I get a lot of hate from both sides. . but I think in this particular case you may be missing the point of my tweet. . .
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You can twist this FISA warrant many ways. Fact is, its stinks to high heaven. Trump needs to declassify and let's find the truth.
-
Everyone is interested in the truth accept when it involves the democrat party and Hillary Clinton. Not one leak from dem server was not true. But here we are with questionable FISA warrants secured by an erroneous report and approved by Barack Obama.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don’t you find this a bit troubling, regardless of your political affiliation? There were obvious lies told to the FISA court
-
Now it’s lies. Before the affidavit became public, you were all saying they told the FISA court nothing. Get your arguments straight. The FBI, the DOJ,the FISA process and FISA courts did it right. The GOP can’t stand the fact that GOP goons have been busted for lying to America.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Very disingenuous, Dan. If they could say “candidate #1”, they could say say “candidate #2” as well. They did somersaults in avoiding saying this info came from Hillary’s campaign. Worst, it set precedence-I’m afraid future FBI’s will be used in elections by the party in power
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
C’mon Dana....”identified US person” vs what it really was: a paid political operator funded by the DNC & Hillary’s camp. Sorta like testifying to the court I was in a rowboat....named USS New Jersey. A small difference.
-
But it *says* "looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1's campaign". What more would you want them to say? And regardless, people looking for dirt sometimes find... dirt. The fact they're looking for it doesn't make the dirt less dirty.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Page (Carter) is our Zelig. Come on Mueller. Charge him or get off the pot;.pic.twitter.com/5MLX1H0L3b
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork using words like speculate and likely would lead a judge to believe that the FBI didn’t know exactly who paid for the dossier, when they clearly didThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really? Why didn't they just say "this information came from a political opponent, has not been verified, and as such, may be false?" Fewer words and far more clear it seems to me.
-
Judges are familiar with the writing style of FISA apps and know what may or may not be false. They look at evidence as part of their job.
-
That's pretty lame. There was no reason not to write it plainly...unless perhaps they were trying to obfuscate the fact. I mean, it was only 400+ pages...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.