Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
danabrams's profile
Dan Abrams
Dan Abrams
Dan Abrams
Verified account
@danabrams

Tweets

Dan AbramsVerified account

@danabrams

Chief Legal Analyst @ABC News; Host #LivePD @AETV; Founder @Mediaite @LawCrimeNews @TheMarySue

New York, NY
dan-abrams.com
Joined February 2009

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Dan Abrams‏Verified account @danabrams Jul 24

    Dan Abrams Retweeted Byron York

    So misleading: "The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. person was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1's campaign," Justice dept/govt protocol of "minimization" includes not naming names. It was clear this info came from political actorhttps://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1021807996609986567 …

    Dan Abrams added,

    Byron YorkVerified account @ByronYork
    'Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele's efforts.' Remarkable how many seem deeply invested in denying this is true. http://ow.ly/KTIq30l6ekh 
    10:47 AM - 24 Jul 2018
    • 50 Retweets
    • 170 Likes
    • paula j. tharpe Ethan Nony2U 𝕋𝕚𝕣𝕖𝕕 ʕ•́ᴥ•̀ʔっ SongBird 👑💘🌅💐🗽🇺🇸 Jennifer Rubin Christopher Stearns andnothingbuttheruth Ducky
    15 replies 50 retweets 170 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Dan Abrams‏Verified account @danabrams Jul 24
        Replying to @zoesmom121 @JRubinBlogger

        Umm You have every right not to like me and I get a lot of hate from both sides. . but I think in this particular case you may be missing the point of my tweet. . .

        3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      3. 2 more replies
      1. New conversation
      2. Luke‏ @Luke108 Jul 24
        Replying to @danabrams

        You can twist this FISA warrant many ways. Fact is, its stinks to high heaven. Trump needs to declassify and let's find the truth.

        2 replies 0 retweets 15 likes
      3. David from PA 🇺🇸‏ @DavidFromPA Jul 24
        Replying to @Luke108 @danabrams

        Everyone is interested in the truth accept when it involves the democrat party and Hillary Clinton. Not one leak from dem server was not true. But here we are with questionable FISA warrants secured by an erroneous report and approved by Barack Obama.

        0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Rob‏ @piratedwight Jul 24
        Replying to @danabrams

        Don’t you find this a bit troubling, regardless of your political affiliation? There were obvious lies told to the FISA court

        3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes
      3. MJ Delaney‏ @gracieandmike Jul 24
        Replying to @piratedwight @danabrams

        Now it’s lies. Before the affidavit became public, you were all saying they told the FISA court nothing. Get your arguments straight. The FBI, the DOJ,the FISA process and FISA courts did it right. The GOP can’t stand the fact that GOP goons have been busted for lying to America.

        0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. Andrew Lovsness‏ @drewlovs Jul 24
        Replying to @danabrams

        Very disingenuous, Dan. If they could say “candidate #1”, they could say say “candidate #2” as well. They did somersaults in avoiding saying this info came from Hillary’s campaign. Worst, it set precedence-I’m afraid future FBI’s will be used in elections by the party in power

        0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1.  ❌Rising Tides ❌‏ @L8rL Jul 24
        Replying to @danabrams

        Wrong!pic.twitter.com/DgDP3jZ05Q

        0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. BigOklie‏ @calhounpr1 Jul 24
        Replying to @danabrams

        C’mon Dana....”identified US person” vs what it really was: a paid political operator funded by the DNC & Hillary’s camp. Sorta like testifying to the court I was in a rowboat....named USS New Jersey. A small difference.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      3. Rather Fandom‏ @FandomRather Jul 24
        Replying to @calhounpr1 @danabrams

        But it *says* "looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1's campaign". What more would you want them to say? And regardless, people looking for dirt sometimes find... dirt. The fact they're looking for it doesn't make the dirt less dirty.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      4. End of conversation
      1. CIRESERROT‏ @TORRESORTIZBD Jul 24
        Replying to @danabrams

        #LapDog

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. Full Spectrum Domino‏ @fullspecdomino Jul 25
        Replying to @danabrams

        Page (Carter) is our Zelig. Come on Mueller. Charge him or get off the pot;.pic.twitter.com/5MLX1H0L3b

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. CTOWN_AZ‏ @Red_Right_88 Jul 24
        Replying to @danabrams

        It's misleading if you ignore the basic facts #srawny #dimwit

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. joe mattio‏ @joemattio Jul 24
        Replying to @danabrams

        @ByronYork using words like speculate and likely would lead a judge to believe that the FBI didn’t know exactly who paid for the dossier, when they clearly did

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Peter S. Lee‏ @pleemirage Jul 25
        Replying to @danabrams @_cgp

        Really? Why didn't they just say "this information came from a political opponent, has not been verified, and as such, may be false?" Fewer words and far more clear it seems to me.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      3. cgp‏ @_cgp Jul 25
        Replying to @pleemirage @danabrams

        Judges are familiar with the writing style of FISA apps and know what may or may not be false. They look at evidence as part of their job.

        1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      4. Peter S. Lee‏ @pleemirage Jul 26
        Replying to @_cgp @danabrams

        That's pretty lame. There was no reason not to write it plainly...unless perhaps they were trying to obfuscate the fact. I mean, it was only 400+ pages...

        0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info