@danabrams I Have watched you give STELLAR legal commentary for years. Have always held YOUR commentary in the highest... UNTIL you implied that the "cosiness" between Davidson & Cohen was anything less than malpractice. God I hope U haven't be coopted too.
As I pointed out, potential “malpractice” is a separate issue from winning a civil lawsuit
-
-
If I remember correctly, you asked (rhetorically) “What damages would she have?” when arguing that she has no case. Ridiculous. The texts are post-settlement but the totality of circumstances point to collusion on the settlement too. $130K from a billionaire is peanuts!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.