I'm perplexed by an academic ending a serious set of arguments with "boom".
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
To the extent that RCP8.5 has been consistently misrepresented as business-as-usual when it is clear it was never intended as such, much less likely to actually happen, there has been a lot of bad science. Deny this and you defend bad science.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
You know what I love about science? When new evidence arises, we can adjust to suit. Throw away the old model, go with the new.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Agreed. He's still looking for attention and trying to milk this (
) for all it is worth. That alone is bad enough, but to try and do so by present oneself as some kind of "honest broker" who is genuinely looking out for science is laughable and disingenuous.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
You're doing a good job if RPJ is attacking you back ;)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
His points are factually correct, however.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
