I read a story over the weekend imagining a future where advertising is illegal, and I can’t stop thinking about it - especially in light of our current efforts to understand how companies and countries purchase influence & outcomes.
-
Show this thread
-
It was written in 1973, but the author must have had a magic mirror to 45 years in the future, because their characterization of instagram influencers is just so spot on.
2 replies 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
The story is this one. There’s A LOT of plot, & a lot of prescient imaginings, including: - fast always-on internet - realtime streams of audience sentiment used to tune content in realtime - scripted “reality” tv I’m still sifting through the layers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Girl_Who_Was_Plugged_In …
6 replies 5 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
Another interesting layer is that the story was written by a fierce feminist woman, writing as a man for an audience of men.
1 reply 2 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
In one part she’s explaining why a woman with a traumatic past might not be interested in sex, and I thought, “why on earth would she feel the need to explain something so obv- OH.” Because men don’t know this stuff, and she’s a dude writing for dudes.
2 replies 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
Anyway the big idea that I’ve been dwelling on is that if you outlaw advertising because of its pernicious negative influence on people, it doesn’t disappear - it just gets harder to identify. It gets subtle - the boundaries between content & advertising blur.
3 replies 4 retweets 26 likesShow this thread
We already have 'native' ad and influencer content; am I understanding correctly that you think we will get more of that if advertising is outlawed? Do you think orders of magnitude more or just some more?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.