Yeah Spider-Man is technically not an Avengers employee but an "independent contractor"https://twitter.com/needsmorealeph/status/839785979456151552 …
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
(There's no goddamn way that arming a minor and sending him into battle isn't against the Accords by the way)
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
I get that it's in-character for Tony to be a gigantic hypocrite but he's a gigantic hypocrite and all he actually wanted was to kill Bucky
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
This was pointed out directly in the comics too -- Peter being on Tony's side in Civil War made no sense
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
In the movie it actually seems like Tony never even told Peter what the fight was about, which makes him an even bigger dick
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
Under the terms of the accords Peter would at minimum have to give up being Spider-Man
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
More likely he would be taken away to live in a laboratory for anomalous radioactive teenage spider people
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
I mean he's objectively much less dangerous than Wanda but he is part spider and people don't like spiders
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
also why hasn't Thor caused a world wide religious crisis?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Cybren @arthur_affect
and do we ever learn who that secretive shadow council that Fury talks to in the first Avengers movie is?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
(also why go through the effort of casting Samuel L Jackson and not give him a solo movie?)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.