It just depends. Not all languages die off. Java is still around because of server side and Android. Adaptability makes a difference
-
-
En réponse à @SleepyDaddySoft @McFunkypants
AS3 didn't run anywhere but flash. .NET runs server-side, client side (multiplatform), and embedded. Works as AOT and JIT too.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @SleepyDaddySoft @McFunkypants
Biggest problem with .NET and C# is that it was created by MS, and there's a pretty unfair anti-MS bias in much of the industry
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @SleepyDaddySoft
yeah the msft taint is a real problem i just start thinking about vb runtimes or msvc dlls
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @McFunkypants
client-side dev (mobile and web) seems to be the biggest driver of language adoption. Thus rise of JS/Swift/Java and soon Kotlin
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @SleepyDaddySoft @McFunkypants
Most dev studios will only ever consider the "official" language for a platform (Swift/Objective C for Apple, Java for Android, JS for web)
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @SleepyDaddySoft @McFunkypants
C# only has UWP, which hasn't gained a lot of dev traction or user market share
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
UWP has JavaScript too
-
-
En réponse à @cyannick @McFunkypants
Technically, it does. Some apps use it, but most use C++ and/or C#. Difficult/impossible to use existing web frameworks in UWP/JS
0 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.