Your occasional reminder that economists have no idea what the impact of climate change on our economy will be. They don't even agree on the shape of the function. From En-ROADS:pic.twitter.com/W8aJ7UPz3R
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Many economists (except those making macro projections) will tell you that the best academic and government economic projections are often way off. The US and world economies are very complicated. Like climate. Look at inflation predictions. The current rate is running at 6.2%>
The major forecasters said it would be 1.6%-2.8%. The Federal Open Market Committee in mid-March predicted 2.4% This case is not unusual. In the late 1990s almost all economists agreed the new digital economy was recession proof. Then the banking and housing markets melted. >>
Start putting economics on more physical footings!
@nephologue @ProfSteveKeenhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237672 …
Those graphs bring to mind the variability in CMIP models predicting avg T over different RCPs, right? Oh, shoot, I shouldn't have written that. It doesn't fit Andrew's narrative at all. 
I agree, but would add "... and in the face that risk is assymetrical. Global warming can be turned on, but not off."
Good policy has three fundamental criteria. 1) it has to be fair 2) it has to be affordable, and 3) it has to work.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.