I think we all knew the AGW brigade were lying
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The period 1998-2014 makes a poor comparison here, since it was heavily biased toward La Niña states, offsetting actual warming through the period. It probably matters for about 0.1-0.2C. The period after 2014 has the opposite signal.
-
The second paper seems resilient to this concern.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I do not think that temperature is our biggest problem: Oct 2018 Arctic Dynamics as part of a Global Pattern. D Fdez-Sevilla PhD DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26042.03522 May 2019 Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities in Atmospheric Circulation. D Fdez-Sevilla PhD DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26791.80805
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Not sure that’s true, but since the vast majority of the energy from warming is going into the oceans with significant effects, even if true, not sure it’s particularly relevant. The rise in ocean heat content has been consistent and massive for decades.pic.twitter.com/YqjjXDcqbQ
-
Obviously Randall, if you can't accurately model an irrelevant detail then it means you don't know anything about the system.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Models fail in many ways, missing post 1940 trend stagnation altogether.
-
That's because no one is paying attention to what's coming out of NASA JPL and the Paris Observatory https://journals.ametsoc.org/ei/article/20/4/1/629/Does-an-Intrinsic-Source-Generate-a-Shared-Low …pic.twitter.com/dVtsrELrQZ
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Curry has integrity & has a quest for objective understanding. Appreciate the integrity & hard work.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.