I'd love to see the decision making behind a price like this: maybe they initially priced it at like 1/10 of that and realized "this is gonna make terrible headlines forever, we might as well make _money_ doing it"
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
Wouldn’t it be great if the public benefitted directly from millions (billions?) of dollars of R&D paid for by their taxes? Without worrying about their insurance haggling over claims for life?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Worth every penny, I’d say. See this
video https://twitter.com/nationwidekids …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probably should consider a payment scheme that is spread out over a lifetime. No reason for a single payer to bear the entire cost up front.
-
No reason why it shouldn't be covered by insurance :-|
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where is the durability data? Two of these claims not backed up by data, your headline is no better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's not immunosuppressant. It expressed a protein that is otherwise dysfunctional. Imagine fixing a flat tire by just attaching another tire to that side of the car, slightly larger than the flat tire it's compensating for.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.