Conversation

However irredeemable their divergence from the architectural principles of Vitruvius (and every design principle of Antiquity & the Middle Ages...), and however far from the charm, usability, & longevity of vernacular architecture... they aren't the real problem.
Image
5
952
Because, at least, they're saying something. Even if you don't like what they stand for, there is an aspirational quality about these buildings. There is a concerted effort - even an abstract, anti-human one - to *create* something which is in some (convoluted) way, meaningful.
Image
10
1,324
The same could be said of Brutalism. Whatever you think of its style or what it represents politically/artistically/culturally, you can't deny that it does have both of those things: A style, and a message.
Image
9
1,503
The real problem isn't the prize-winning, headline-grabbing, discussion-provoking, abstract, theoretical-architecture edifices. Rather, it's the plain details of ordinary buildings, the ones that don't win prizes or generate discussion. There is a negligence toward beauty.
8
2,191
Here are some examples: 1. Ceiling Tiles They're EVERYWHERE. And they are ugly, easily broken, unnatural, peculiar, claustrophobic. But they ARE functional: cheap & allow access to electrics. This will become a theme...
Image
16
2,921
2. Whitewashed Walls & Grey Carpets Why does every office look like this? Grey carpets & whitewashed walls. No colour. No design. No attempt to make it a pleasant environment. Minimalism? Cost-efficiency?
Image
30
2,322
3. Purely Functional Design This bus shelter gets the job done, sure. You can wait inside to get away from the rain or wind. But that's all. No flair. Nothing inviting. No attempt to create even the slightest bit of beauty in the ordinary.
Image
35
2,553
4. Apathetic Choices Compare these two university lecture halls. Which one would you rather study in? There is on obvious reason why they look so different. Only that the second, newer one, required no effort to design & build. A (cheap) tick-box exercise.
Image
Image
29
2,558
5. Painfully Bright Lighting In the words of Junichiro Tanizaki: "The progressive Westerner is determined always to better his lot... his quest for a brighter light never ceases, he spares no pains to eradicate even the minutest shadow."
Image
28
3,191
And this is a problem because it is incredibly hard to fight against. There is no identifiable cultural movement behind it, no specific architect or school of thought. It's a deep-set, general, social problem.
15
1,876
See, this isn't about those large-scale, multi-million dollar projects. (Though there ARE issues with them, that's not the crux of it.) The every day things are what is most concerning.
1
1,452
There is no "vision" or "statement" to take issue with. It is a silent, creeping creed of apathy. Worse, it is a silent creed of ugliness. For example, compare these light-switches.
Image
Image
38
3,101
There is only one Kunsthaus Graz, and a few thousand similar buildings. But there are hundreds of millions of polystyrene ceiling tiles, grey carpets, whitewashed walls, functional streetlamps, painfully bright LED lights, poorly proportioned windows, and tarmacked streets.
Image
Image
13
2,163