Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @cstewartiii

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @cstewartiii

  1. prije 8 sati

    I'm interviewed on Market Place Tech about Iowa and related things in election technology.

    Poništi
  2. prije 20 sati

    I've written this piece for Wired Magazine, reflecting on what we can learn from Iowa.

    Poništi
  3. prije 23 sata

    Looks like Sanders has a wasted votes problem in IA.

    Poništi
  4. 4. velj

    Happy to have helped out this interesting story by a team of journalists who know and appreciate what good election administration looks like.

    Poništi
  5. 4. velj

    7. RCV is not our savior. Some people I admire argue this is an example of why we need rank-choice voting. I like RCV. But, it’s also complicated and prone to complaints when first-round leaders lose out in vote distribution. This event has little to add to the RCV debate.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 4. velj

    6. The value of starting in a small state. I’ve never been worried about the first nominating events being in small states. Candidates and the parties need to ramp up somewhat gradually. Better a screw-up in Iowa (or New Hampshire) than in a big state.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 4. velj

    5. The freak-out over not knowing. So much to say here. Democrats and much of the media want an anointed nominee/savior right now to take on Trump. What should be bumps in the road are becoming existential crises. Take a deep breath, people.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 4. velj

    4. The inadequacy of back-up plans as the main system. Often, we point to back-up systems, such as paper ballots and paper poll books, as fail-safes in case election computers fail. This is fine if there are one-off problems. They’re not fine when they become the primary system.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 4. velj

    3. Learning from tech snafus. I worry that wrong lessons will be learned from failure of the vote-reporting app. Problems seem due to failure to perform under load, usability,& lack of capacity in phone back-up, not security. Security is important, but it is not the only thing.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 4. velj

    2. The role of technology. Computer technology can help facilitate the tedious calculations that go into figuring who won. But, technology needs to be rigorously tested before being put into use. Don’t use the election/caucus as an opportunity to beta test, much less alpha test.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 4. velj

    1. Who runs “elections?” A caucus isn’t an election, of course, it’s an event run entirely by a party. Despite concerns about election administration in the U.S., one thing the fiasco illustrates is what happens when true amateurs run elections (or “elections.”)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 4. velj

    I've posted 7 initial thoughts on the IA caucus at Election Updates: . Click on the link, or read the tweet storm...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    Rightwing groups spread false information about voter rolls hours before Iowa caucuses

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Read this. 👇 False info is being spread about voter lists in Iowa and elsewhere. There aren’t more voters reg’d than citizens. But election officials of both parties are fighting back with the truth.

    Poništi
  15. 4. velj

    It strikes me that the complaints about "chaos" from IA caucus results are coming from non-Iowans. Too bad. It's not your caucus.

    Poništi
  16. 3. velj

    There are other methodological issues here, too. For instance, the denominator is an *estimate*, not an actual count. But, the big problem is using a numerator that says nothing about the max number of people who could conceivably ask for a ballot.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 3. velj

    The inactive registration category is a fail-safe status signaling that someone is *possibly* no longer eligible, but who will not be removed immediately. They can be reactivated by re-registering, changing reg info, or voting after showing ID document w/ proof-of-address.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 3. velj

    JW includes *inactive* registrations in its totals, which is primarily people who have been flagged as probably dead or moved away. No counties in Iowa have > 100% active voter registration rates.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 3. velj

    The Judicial Watch statistics on Iowa registration rates show just how *not* to use underlying demographic data to judge registration rates. One amateur mistake that’s made in situations like this is not focusing on *active* registration.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 2. velj

    Of course, there is evidence that Russians and Russian sympathizers probed VR systems and engaged in disinformation campaigns related to the election, but that is quite different from "tampering with vote totals."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·