Weren't these law professors called as witnesses to be the neutral, objective experts on constitutional law? Also, who is she apologizing to?
Pamela Karlan: "I want to apologize for what I said earlier about the president's son. It was wrong of me to do that. I wish the president would apologize, obviously, for the things that he's done that's wrong, but I do regret having said that."pic.twitter.com/7lYiRWCKjw
-
-
-
A "conditional" "apology" is NO apology.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Conditional apologies are not apologies
-
Thank you. I'm not buying it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The second she mentions the prwsident apologizing..at that time her apology becomes illegitimate..
-
Exactly!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So... sorry not sorry
-
Precisely
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Couldn't even do the right thing without adding her two cents.
-
Exactly... that is not an apology...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.