"Do you think NE could carry out the death penalty without this bill?" "It'd be very difficult, but I don't know that I'd say impossible"
-
-
Replying to @csmcdaniel
DOC Director: "I found sources but wasn't able to complete the process."










1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csmcdaniel
Btw, here's the language of the bill: http://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/105/PDF/Intro/LB661.pdf …pic.twitter.com/RdGFPgv1gF
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csmcdaniel
Lawmaker asks Frakes if would-be suppliers have objected because of moral objections or fear of threats. Frakes responds: moral objections
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @csmcdaniel
Lawmaker follows up and asks then why is this secrecy needed. Frakes says he hasn't reached out to enough suppliers
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csmcdaniel
Up now is an opponent to the secrecy. Lawmaker asks: "What use is this information other than for harassment?"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csmcdaniel
"I object to the term harassment. Sometimes people need to be sued because of how serious it is."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @csmcdaniel
Lawmaker asks if having it discoverable but not open record would be okay. Response: Sometimes it's so shady that public needs to know
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @csmcdaniel
Up next is the league of women voters, speaking against the secrecy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @csmcdaniel
ACLU rep says he doesn't fault Nebraska DOC for "falling for a scam." Frakes "was desperate."
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @csmcdaniel
Another lawmaker says that thiopental is used in anesthesiology in the US... which again is not true
1 reply 4 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.