How is this not the worst of all worlds.https://next.redhat.com/2018/11/14/ukl-a-unikernel-based-on-linux/ …
-
-
-
Replying to @kubernetesonarm
Many of the advantages of unikernels are simplicity, efficiency, and safety. Starting with a code base that is none of these, and then attempting to achieve it while maintaining compatibility seems infeasible. I think they fail to understand why unikernel adoption struggles.
4 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @ibuildthecloud @kubernetesonarm
I challenge their core assertion, "The fundamental problem is that today’s unikernels ... have abandoned the evolutionary community process that has made Linux such a success." Show me your data.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Based on my experience in OSS over the last 4 years, I'd guess OSS unikernel projects probably struggle for the same reasons that other OSS projects do. Lack of marketing budget or giant corporate interest.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
"evolutionary community process..." WTF are they talking about? Did they just suggest unikernels are not OSS? MirageOS is a Linux
@linuxfoundation project.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Not speaking for RH or authors but this was hopefully more about leveraging existing Linux ecosystem investments & bringing associated community thereof along an alternate, perceived-easier path of “doing unikernels”.. unfortunate choice of words tho so I might contact them tmrw
-
-
Replying to @csirac2 @allingeek and
If you talk to Ali send my regards. It would be really cool to talk to them. We'd be happy sharing our experiences with RH.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.