The headline is 100% correct, but any argument that posits a binary between liberals who want democratic norms and leftists who want economic restructuring, without a thorough examination of social change & reaction, is missing at least half the story. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/05/americas-brand-of-capitalism-is-incompatible-with-democracy.html …
and bc most of the white folks are pacified now, they do as white folks do and defend the status quo. "None of us are free until all of us are free" is true in many ways, but... not always.
-
-
BUT also I have to recognize that bc I'm a middle class queer black person largely assimilated into this straight white world, I am most likely to benefit from social change, and frankly, most likely to suffer from economic redistribution (I should 100% pay more in taxes).
Show this thread -
so me constantly thinking "please keep my shit on the agenda too" may be self-serving, representative of a narrow slice of materially-comfortable interests rather than the broader swaths of people an economic justice agenda might benefit.
Show this thread -
OTOH, maybe I'm right and the straight white men who still control most political power will enact nominally "race-neutral," "gender-neutral," "accessible" "welcoming" pro-worker policies that just happen to further entrench power differentials along identity lines.
Show this thread -
oh nevermind I read another article by the same author; he ain't really worried about us, lol. "Make white people care more about their class than their race" is both less ethically sound and less electorally viable than a lot of (left-leaning) white folks think.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.