Huh, that just clarified a lot for me. And I think it is a reasonable, livable compromise for conservatives. Conservative policy ideas are not to be out-of-hand dismissed, but the existence of racism and sexism etc is not to be questioned.
And it doesn't even necessarily require the admission of fault by conservatives, or not quite. It just means saying, "of course, [insert policy idea here] will disproportionately affect black and Hispanic people because of residential segregation. The way to address that is..."
-
-
Or like, "regardless of the reason, black people encounter the police more often. So [insert police policy here] will affect black communities in ways xyz..."
Show this thread -
And yeah that forces conservatives to be upfront about their analysis of WHY black people encounter the police more often, or the fact of residential segregation. And maybe they make a discredited claim in giving the why. But at least they address the obvious facts.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.