Idk. Clinton promised health care reform. Obama promised health care reform. Is Medicare-For-All really so much more persuasive than whatever Clinton and Obama were promising on the campaign trail?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I dunno about all that. In current elections basically every Dem is doing well, from socialists to centrists. It’s not like the Presidential election is the only one where people vote. And even then, what about McGovern? Mondale? Dukakis? They were all considered pretty liberal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
And we ALSO don’t have data for how many voters an actual progressive agenda turns away. Certainly it’s hard to blame Democrats for losing with McGovern et al and only getting two terms with arch neoliberal Clinton, and then thinking American voters want centrists.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
All that said, I think now is the perfect time to push for more progressive economic policy, bc the most economically squeamish part of our coalition in the burbs doesn’t like Trump very much, and are likely to turn out for any Dem, even one farther left than they’d prefer.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
I think the argument boils down to this: we don’t know how much a populist argument fuels turnout. The populist economic policy planks are now (thanks in part to Obama btw) not so far apart from the nominally centrist ones.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
So what it boils down to is trust more than policy, I think. And I happen to think what politician you trust has more to do with the dreaded identity politics (and who speaks to your identity/culture) than with class because *waves hand at US history*.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
I’m not saying more progressive economics couldn’t help Dems pick up various seats in various places. But I really believe the best that’s going to get you is a 2008 scenario where Dems have a LOT of political power for 2 years and then a big backlash.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I mean, actually yes, it was. Obamacare was too much of a government intrusion, and the deficit spending was bankrupting America. That’s what the Tea Party et al ran on. What they MEANT was “I hate that black guy” but what they ran on was anti-economic populism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
As far as I’m concerned, Dems lost so bad in 2010 bc a) we relied heavily on a coalition that has lower midterm turnout, b) the president’s party ALWAYS loses in midterms, and c) racism. With a fig leaf of “stop spending money on poor people.”
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.