And the fault lines among existing voters are, I think, mostly on social issues, or even economic issues as viewed through a social/identity/tribal lens. I think Republicans could get a meaningful governing majority on racist populism bc disproportionate political power.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Idk. Clinton promised health care reform. Obama promised health care reform. Is Medicare-For-All really so much more persuasive than whatever Clinton and Obama were promising on the campaign trail?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I dunno about all that. In current elections basically every Dem is doing well, from socialists to centrists. It’s not like the Presidential election is the only one where people vote. And even then, what about McGovern? Mondale? Dukakis? They were all considered pretty liberal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
And we ALSO don’t have data for how many voters an actual progressive agenda turns away. Certainly it’s hard to blame Democrats for losing with McGovern et al and only getting two terms with arch neoliberal Clinton, and then thinking American voters want centrists.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
All that said, I think now is the perfect time to push for more progressive economic policy, bc the most economically squeamish part of our coalition in the burbs doesn’t like Trump very much, and are likely to turn out for any Dem, even one farther left than they’d prefer.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
I think the argument boils down to this: we don’t know how much a populist argument fuels turnout. The populist economic policy planks are now (thanks in part to Obama btw) not so far apart from the nominally centrist ones.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
So what it boils down to is trust more than policy, I think. And I happen to think what politician you trust has more to do with the dreaded identity politics (and who speaks to your identity/culture) than with class because *waves hand at US history*.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold
I’m not saying more progressive economics couldn’t help Dems pick up various seats in various places. But I really believe the best that’s going to get you is a 2008 scenario where Dems have a LOT of political power for 2 years and then a big backlash.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If what you want is a new stable political situation, where the government isn’t completely paralyzed by the two parties refusing to let each other govern, you have to tackle the cultural issues. Dems aren’t going to reshape American politics with more populism.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.