I don’t really think that’s true either, honestly. Again, Dems should have a more aggressive economic agenda bc it is smart and good, but I’m not all that convinced it’ll motivate many new voters til it gets passed, if then.
I’m not saying more progressive economics couldn’t help Dems pick up various seats in various places. But I really believe the best that’s going to get you is a 2008 scenario where Dems have a LOT of political power for 2 years and then a big backlash.
-
-
If what you want is a new stable political situation, where the government isn’t completely paralyzed by the two parties refusing to let each other govern, you have to tackle the cultural issues. Dems aren’t going to reshape American politics with more populism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I mean, actually yes, it was. Obamacare was too much of a government intrusion, and the deficit spending was bankrupting America. That’s what the Tea Party et al ran on. What they MEANT was “I hate that black guy” but what they ran on was anti-economic populism.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.