An interesting fact: 24 Senators, all but 1 Democratic, voted against Bill Clinton's welfare reform act. 4 Senators, two R, two D, voted against the Crime Bill.
-
Show this thread
-
Also, I call it Bill Clinton's welfare reform act---in reality it was authored and introduced by Republicans (John Kasich!) and signed by Clinton who had campaigned in 92 on ending welfare as a way of appealing to white "Reagan Democrats."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
The reality is that white populists are the swing voters that have decided every election probably since Eisenhower. It is possible that in the depths of the financial crisis, these white populists were finally ready to trust the government again to help.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
But would they have been ready to accept that help from a government led by a black man? Or a white woman? Given that the first manifestation of white 'populist' anger was the small government "constitutional conservative" tea party, one suspects not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
I just wish folks would have a little more patience for those of us who are always bringing up race because at the end of the day, no matter how the Obama era felt, we are always in greater danger of getting left behind by a democratic government because we're a minority.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
I really think that the way that the Obama era felt (to whites?) like a social revolution and an economic retrenchment has blinded a lot of us to the fundamental structure of a democracy, and accordingly how fragile minority political power is.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
and like... it's true! A lot changed socially whereas economically Obama's primary contribution was to patch up the existing bad system, add a few guardrails + the CFPB and shovel the people's money into the beast til it could run on its own again.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
But ultimately I see that as a quirk of history that was inevitable for the first black president, who would not have been permitted to have been a real revolutionary (such a person might actually work for true racial justice, which is intolerable to most white voters).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
It doesn't obscure the more elementary dynamics going on underneath: the poor and working class outnumber the rich. Racial minorities do not (yet) outnumber whites.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
That doesn't mean you don't work to harness the power of the poor and working class. But it does mean you do so with strong cultural taboos to protect the underprivileged/minority groups.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
And I still get frustrated when those taboos are reduced to attacks on working people's political movements (aka Bernie Sanders), AND when those taboos are actually used as attacks on working people's political movements (aka Bernie Sanders).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.