An interesting fact: 24 Senators, all but 1 Democratic, voted against Bill Clinton's welfare reform act. 4 Senators, two R, two D, voted against the Crime Bill.
I really think that the way that the Obama era felt (to whites?) like a social revolution and an economic retrenchment has blinded a lot of us to the fundamental structure of a democracy, and accordingly how fragile minority political power is.
-
-
That's why it is guarded so jealously. That also has something to do with why it feels elitist: minority groups probably do have to rely on the support of the elite in a way a majoritarian movement does not.
Show this thread -
tl;dr: even when poor white people lose in American politics, somebody's fighting for them. Whereas minorities (let alone queer people)... whether or not anybody gives a fuck about us is much more dicey.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and like... it's true! A lot changed socially whereas economically Obama's primary contribution was to patch up the existing bad system, add a few guardrails + the CFPB and shovel the people's money into the beast til it could run on its own again.
Show this thread -
But ultimately I see that as a quirk of history that was inevitable for the first black president, who would not have been permitted to have been a real revolutionary (such a person might actually work for true racial justice, which is intolerable to most white voters).
Show this thread - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.