An interesting fact: 24 Senators, all but 1 Democratic, voted against Bill Clinton's welfare reform act. 4 Senators, two R, two D, voted against the Crime Bill.
But would they have been ready to accept that help from a government led by a black man? Or a white woman? Given that the first manifestation of white 'populist' anger was the small government "constitutional conservative" tea party, one suspects not.
-
-
I just wish folks would have a little more patience for those of us who are always bringing up race because at the end of the day, no matter how the Obama era felt, we are always in greater danger of getting left behind by a democratic government because we're a minority.
Show this thread -
I really think that the way that the Obama era felt (to whites?) like a social revolution and an economic retrenchment has blinded a lot of us to the fundamental structure of a democracy, and accordingly how fragile minority political power is.
Show this thread -
That's why it is guarded so jealously. That also has something to do with why it feels elitist: minority groups probably do have to rely on the support of the elite in a way a majoritarian movement does not.
Show this thread -
tl;dr: even when poor white people lose in American politics, somebody's fighting for them. Whereas minorities (let alone queer people)... whether or not anybody gives a fuck about us is much more dicey.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.