Your standard-issue American liberal says: “everybody should have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. No matter who you are, oppressor or oppressed, strong or weak, we will protect your human rights!”pic.twitter.com/kfetv7BBjF
The difference lies in what aspect of the liberal project you emphasize, and what aspects you’re willing to ignore—and what you’re willing to do to make the parts you care about actually happen.
-
-
A final addendum: both the “social justice” left and the alt-right consciously or unconsciously pose a challenge to liberalism insofar as they focus on the rights of groups or collectives rather than individuals.
Show this thread -
Neither camp TOTALLY disregards human rights, but both camps argue that individual rights exist within a larger context of the rights of certain groups of individuals.
Show this thread -
Of course, the “identity politics” that focuses on the rights of groups has existed forever, and in America has primarily benefitted whites, especially rich cishet white men. But today it’s becoming more conscious and explicit again.
Show this thread -
Far from believing this challenge to liberalism represents a Grave Threat To All We Hold Dear, however, I think this is a potential area of growth for liberal ideology to develop into something that better suits our times:
Show this thread -
A post-liberal ideology that recognizes the rights and legitimate interests that we inherit from our differences rather than from our common humanity.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.