that said, Marxism/Marxists does provide the beginnings of an explanation as to why their particular radical change WOULD represent a positive evolutionary step forward... but also I think even Marxists run up against human nature.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Which is not to say I don't believe in revolution of a kind, I guess. It's to say that I think burning it all down is as likely to lead to another disaster as it is to lead to paradise.
Show this thread -
And if you think, "disaster but with the marginalized or some subset thereof on top" is ethical... you're not... WRONG, per se?
Show this thread -
But that's why I think modifying what exists in radical, expansive ways is the best option. It's too slow, I recognize that. But even if it fails, continuity with what exists now saves us a decade or more of murderous chaos, with an uncertain result.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.