“The perfect is the enemy of the good.”
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @versaceaglets @Freeyourmindkid
It’s a continuum. There hasn’t been a single President in modern history that hasn’t had to engage in foreign conflict. The degree to which they try to do it responsibly is highly varied. Whatever you think the “good” alternative is doesn’t exist. Have some perspective.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @versaceaglets @Freeyourmindkid
I wouldn’t disagree with one word of that. But we’re talking about the ideal, which is for this place to have never existed at all, vs. the real, which is what do we do with it now that we’re stuck with it? The answer is to try to fix it. #44 was a decent move in that direction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think many would say it is un-fixable and we should hope for its demise and/or radical reconstruction. I'm more cautious about that because the only road to demise and most roads to radical reconstruction lead through chaos, and I think chaos always favors the powerful.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
but anyway the point is a lot of folks say bc Obama put a smiling face on genocide, he impeded radicalization and actually slowed down process, basically bc he placated many marginalized people (through lies), marginalized ppl who could/should have been radicalized instead.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
And by the way, it doesn’t seem like you disagree with me all that much.pic.twitter.com/Phfk9fl7i7
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
oh yeah, I'm... sorta with you? I'm with you for exactly the reasons I stated in my bio and above, but I think a more radical stance is much more ethical, just less pragmatic, I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It’s ethical on principle. But I don’t think 100s of millions of people dying is worth the possibility of maybe being able to force into creation something that’s never even existed before. So, long term, a succession of “Obamas” could come close. 1 Trump and we’re 1000 yrs back.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
lol, I wouldn't say 1000 years back, and I think a lot of ppl are already living in conditions that are pretty similar to whatever you imagine as "way back," you know? I think we need more radical change than Obama but, like I said, in continuity with existing institutions.
-
-
Replying to @csilverandgold
I agree. If people hadn’t over-corrected like this, then Obamas #2, 3 etc. could have gotten progressively more in line with what radicalization would be trying to strive for. It’s not impossible. That’s the whole idea of believing in people like him as not a savior but a chance.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.