Just gotta elect a few more Democrats, then they’ll actually do something for *you*, they promisehttps://twitter.com/jonathancohn/status/940433406588018689 …
I mean. I would assume the governor acquiesces to a fair number of things because he knows he'll lose. In that case, the veto power is more of a PR tool. So you veto budget items to signal Fiscal Responsibility bc that seems like a winner, but maybe not popular legislation.
-
-
But again, I don't know MA politics that well, maybe the legislature isn't passing anything good. Certainly I don't see a push in MA for single-payer, although I assume that's bc the majority are happy with RomneyCare/MassHealth.
-
(Not that that's a good thing necessarily. May be an example of where satisfying most of the middle/lower middle class aligns their interests with the rich rather than the most vulnerable. Or it may genuinely be providing good coverage even to really poor people. Idk!)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.