it doesn't, not really. It just means that the House can't pass the Senate version of the bill, which if nothing else means we have a better shot of killing whatever Frankenstein emerges from the conference committee.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean... we don't need to be almost certain tho. People are refusing to leave Susan Collins' office. If Collins flips... anything could happen. Could Murkowski be in play? etc etc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who cares what The Dems do though? The Dems didn't plan the women's march, you know? The Republicans didn't plan the Tea Party stuff.
-
Like we should probably leave the Collins office die-ins to constituents but idk I'm SURE some NYC org is doing demonstrations on this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah true. The tax bill is more of a grab bag of horrors and it's less persuasive than "x number will lose healthcare."
-
I'm just saying, what the national party does, imo, lags behind what local activists do, not vice verse.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, they're already calling it a giveaway to the rich. Actually I think ppl have done a decent job at focusing on the 2028 numbers.
-
And like, telescoping it to: yeah they might cut your taxes a little for 10 years but when your taxes go up in 10 years, then what?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah! I mean, hearing their constituents want explicit class appeals is powerful I think.
-
Also, encouraging sign: I was gonna go out my money where my mouth is but Cruz' voicemail is full, so!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.