But this isn't just about Obama. This is John Kerry post-2004. It's Rahm in 2006. It's Bob Casey. What I advocate in this article is not unusual for the Democratic Party. What is unusual is the kind of politics some have practiced over the last 4-6 years.
I realize this is not necessarily your area of concern, but I always wonder: how do you communicate about this to the strong pro-choice voters and the queer voters + allies?
-
-
How do you say, "we're moderating our stance on your thing, reliable voter group, in order to reach out to this group of voters that don't support you/voted for someone who directly threatens your interests and values?"
-
Take the Hyde Amendment...the message is: "We're not going to take a position on repealing something that is never going to be repealed in the short-term so that we appeal to voters who will enable us to do other things you want to see done"
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I try to touch on that in the article. Three basic responses: 1) On abortion/religious freedom, if Doug Jones took up my recommendations he'd still be much more in alignment with progressive stances on those issues than Moore
-
2) He would still support the rest of the prog agenda (insomuch as he does now) 3) There's an argument to be made that taking a more "reasonable" (and I know that is contested) approach is more effective for advancing those interests
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.