LaVar Hosting Jeopardy July 26-30 Stan Account 👁

I will never, ever, ever be persuaded by an argument that says "better that you not help person a who needs help...

Because by helping person a, you're hurting person b." Do a and b both need help? Okay great, let's get to work.

And like... intellectually I see how you get to "caring about group a is a great way to feel good about yourself while hurting group b"

Or even "none of the gains for genderqueer people go to poor genderqueer people so they are basically worthless."

And first off, I think that's objectively false, but even beyond that you will never get me to regret helping people who need help.

Or I'm sorry I didn't even properly understand, you're saying it's all a net loss even for genderqueer people or whatever.

But idk look around at how we treat gender in 2017 vs 1997 vs 1957 and I don't see how you can believe that to be true.

also, like fuck, I don't know what this party is you speak of. Like, the same guy who gutted welfare is the one who signed DOMA.