I realize this tweet is several layers of reference deep, so what I mean is: there are some people who, when they mock the supposed superficiality of "mainstream" Democratic policymaking...
Dear anti-wokesters: if you don't take gender identity seriously, I don't take you seriously. Full stop.
-
-
Show this thread
-
say things like "capitalism, but gender fluid" as though taking gender fluidity seriously is a distracting window dressing rather than a core issue. Whenever I see anything like that, I immediately write that person off as someone I don't need to listen to.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cool. Thanks. That's all good stuff to think about. I guess I should clarify and say I'm not saying I don't take people who don't care about gender identity seriously as humans, I just don't take them seriously as, like, Politics Tweeters, lol.
-
Also like, 90% of the Rose Twitter-ers who say shit like this are middle class socialists, no? If not more?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Oh yeah see I think that is an inherently bad argument and I probably always will. Idk if I'm right or wrong in that but...
-
I will never, ever, ever be persuaded by an argument that says "better that you not help person a who needs help...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If it exists you are talking specifically about the Obama administration since he finished "evolving" on marriage equality.
-
Bc Bill signed DOMA. So like... I have trouble seeing where Bill's Democratic Party was sweet to everybody but the poor.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
1) Yes, I preferred Bernie over Hillary in the primary. However, minorities overwhelmingly chose Clinton. Which leads to:
-
2) yeah I don't like the Hillary coalition either, but if working class white folks are never going to come around, can you blame folks...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.