and like fine if you think "there is one party with two names" but then when Obama comes up you wanna point out all the ppl he killed...
-
Show this thread
-
but when we get to HRC vs Trump all of a sudden the extra lives ruined by Trump that simply wouldn't be ruined under HRC don't matter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Were you duped into thinking Trump would be the anti-globalist he claimed to be, and that he would roll back imperialism?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Did you not notice generals in EVERY AREA OF HIS TRANSITION TEAM AND CABINET?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
It is just plain facts that there are people who are afraid, suffering, dying right now today because Donald Trump is the President.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Not that Hillary Clinton wouldn't have caused anybody to suffer because when you are the head of the American imperialist war machine...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
you cause suffering. It's just facts. No matter how kind and compassionate you are, it's a murderer's job. That's ugly, but it's true.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
But like... Hillary would have caused less than Donald. And again, if we care about EVERY life, then we care about the extra suffering...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
caused by one head of the two-headed American government monster over the other head. Isn't that like... fucking obvious?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
and listen, if Hillary actively hurt your life, then I won't tell you to shut up. I don't have the right to do that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
but if she didn't maybe be conscious of how sexism amplifies your criticisms, and take that into account in your critique.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.