Eh. I mean. At the end of the day we don't trust all science uncritically, and that criticism includes "how do human biases influence this?"
-
Obviously there's somewhere in between "we don't have to listen to science" and "every journal paper is utterly immune to systemic biases."
Although to be fair "Cherynoble wasn't an accident" is a statement that has exactly zero to do with science.
-
-
If that's what they mean by "scientific facts," I mean... yeah the word "accident" and how it absolved humans of blame is a social construct
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.