Obviously there's somewhere in between "we don't have to listen to science" and "every journal paper is utterly immune to systemic biases."
Eh. I mean. At the end of the day we don't trust all science uncritically, and that criticism includes "how do human biases influence this?"
-
-
-
Although to be fair "Cherynoble wasn't an accident" is a statement that has exactly zero to do with science.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.