LaVar Hosting Jeopardy July 26-30 Stan Account 👁

it is now "late," the age for the proletariat to rule should have already come (in the Marxist assumption).

I am not at all opposed to the notion that (some) socialized orders may be superior to (some) capitalist orders.

In fact, formulated like that, any reasonable person who is not an absolute ideologue ought to be able to agree with that.

(of course, said reasonable person should also be able to agree to the reverse.)

And I incline towards the idea that socialism or at minimum social democracy is at present TIMELY. That should be obvious to everyone..

But the question is: what socialist orders are superior to existing capitalist orders? not those that fail to account for depravity, I think

Which, again, is why I am still inclined towards the premise that it is hegemony itself, in all its forms, that is our enemy.

not merely because I believe that premise creates the possibility of wide buy-in (I don't want to ally with capitalists! says the socialist