My meditation for today (and probably the next six months): Am I invested in radical change in continuity with existing institutions...
-
Show this thread
-
because it is smart strategy or merely because my social position militates against true "burn it down" militancy?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
I think the liberation of black people specifically, and the unbalancing of hegemonic societal structures more broadly...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
requires radical change... but that said radical change can happen using existing tools: constitutional conventions...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
all large investment banks state-run and democratically accountable (socialist capital market, independent firms)...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
things that radically alter the structure of our society, but do not require the collapse of the existing order. A sort of evolutionary...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
"punctuated equilibrium" model of social change, rather than a revolution. But is that because chaos is truly too dangerous to risk?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
or is it because the existing order provides for my material needs, even though it works against me in (numerous) other ways?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
are there truly those for whom chaos is a better option than the current order? I don't mean anarchy, I mean true societal failure...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
My basic argument has always been: in chaos, power becomes more powerful. Revolution is a fine game for the majority, but for a minority...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
And I think there is truth to that idea, and yet... you have to be skeptical of anything aligned with your material interests.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.