Sigh. Yes. But "why socialism" isn't exactly my bailiwick. Ergo the "bad socialist" in the heading.
-
-
-
But yeah. "Capitalism is evil" is actually an easier proposition to assent to than "Capitalism should be replaced."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well again, "why socialism" isn't my thing but... for needs we can start with food, shelter, and indoor plumbing.=
-
And for morals, we can start with "anybody who believes all humans should have food, shelter, and indoor pluming," lol.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think you're willfully missing the distinction. Capitalism does a good job of increasing the amount of those things, right?
-
It does a poor job of allocating them based on need. It instead allocates them based on productivity, more or less.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Okay, just to be clear, you understand what I'm saying right? Capitalism may be the best option, but the best option is still bad.
-
Bc people still starve and shit under capitalism. Which is bad. Can we agree on that?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
But currently. It provides a lot, but allocates it such that many many millions of people starve and are homeless, etc. Which is bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.