My latest: Seen through a journalistic lens, Hill's tweets ill-advised:http://es.pn/2x8K7yW
-
Okay for serious, this turns on the definition of white supremacist. Is it something defined by one's interior emotions towards nonwhites?
If so, then yes, it is technically speaking unknowable if ANYONE is a white supremacist. But if it can be determined on the basis of actions
-
-
45's actions give succor, support, aid, and material assistance to the goals of white supremacists. So the term is accurate.
-
I would personally call him more of a white nationalist than a white supremacist per se, but that is a fairly meaningless distinction
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.