His summary of Perlstein's argument (which I have not read) seems to explicitly implicate "conservatism" rather than the GOP specifically.
-
-
So I think an analysis that puts Trumpism in a conservative tradition of American politics that includes the mostly Dem KKK is reasonable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and the notion that illiberalism has come primarily from the political right in American history is probably quite defensible...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and is not, imo, at all undermined by "race riots," which is, imo, pretty damn close to a dog whistle.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @davidfrum
Fair enough; I was responding to your initial "Republicans aren't racist" summary. Still not sure what constitutes an almost-dog-whistle tho
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kabulykos @davidfrum
Fair. The clearer argument is "the current Republican party is racist, following a multiparty tradition of American conservatism."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and an almost dog whistle is something that could definitely have a legitimate point, but is probably just a dog whistle, lol.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @davidfrum
Eh my burden of proof is a bit higher than "probably." Philadelphia, MS was a dog whistle. Alluding to black people in the body politic? nah
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If I went around being that suspicious of words on the internet I'd go insane.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kabulykos @davidfrum
Shrug. If I'm insane, that's definitely not why. "Assume racism" may not be as nice as "assume goodwill" but is it less accurate?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Usually I assume goodwill and racism at the same time, to be honest.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.