oh yeah, for the average person race riots = ferguson, maybe LA in 92. Either way, ppl think of black ppl with the term race riots.
-
-
Replying to @csilverandgold @davidfrum
My first thought was "Gangs of New York" TBH — either way that verbal Rorschach seems a fairly minor component of the larger piece. 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You cited Tulsa; I imagine Wilmington — notably both occurred back when black folks voted for Republicans at least 2:1. 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Any analysis that far back will lose traction trying to assign racism to just one party. For Dems was collusion; GOP usually indifference.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kabulykos @davidfrum
His summary of Perlstein's argument (which I have not read) seems to explicitly implicate "conservatism" rather than the GOP specifically.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So I think an analysis that puts Trumpism in a conservative tradition of American politics that includes the mostly Dem KKK is reasonable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and the notion that illiberalism has come primarily from the political right in American history is probably quite defensible...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and is not, imo, at all undermined by "race riots," which is, imo, pretty damn close to a dog whistle.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @davidfrum
Fair enough; I was responding to your initial "Republicans aren't racist" summary. Still not sure what constitutes an almost-dog-whistle tho
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kabulykos @davidfrum
Fair. The clearer argument is "the current Republican party is racist, following a multiparty tradition of American conservatism."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
and an almost dog whistle is something that could definitely have a legitimate point, but is probably just a dog whistle, lol.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.