Not whether, why. If they choose based on sexual orientation, that's pretty shitty. If they choose based on fascist-or-not...
-
-
I mean doesn't every restaurant still have those "retain the right to refuse service" signs? Still can't discriminate against black people.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Ok I'm really just asking a question. Does this extend to all political views? For example could someone discriminate against democrats?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Imo, the government should intervene in the case of a) historical disadvantage/disenfranchisement, b) major quality-of-life effects.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @faroutmadman and
Democrats (or Republicans) would never fall under (a), but could fall under (b) if, for example, every grocery store in a given area...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @faroutmadman and
refuses service to people of a given major political party.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @faroutmadman and
But presumably capitalism would save us from discrimination against such large swaths of economically empowered people?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csilverandgold @faroutmadman and
Unless there was a long history/deep-seated motivation for discrimination? In which case it would fall under (a).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But this assumes that there is a predominant deep-seated motivation for discrimination today.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I mean... not necessarily if your goal is to remedy the historical wrong, but also, yeah there is such a motivation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
and I truly, TRULY do not care to debate the continuing existence of racism (or sexism or anti-queer bias) in America on twitter.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.