Not whether, why. If they choose based on sexual orientation, that's pretty shitty. If they choose based on fascist-or-not...
-
refuses service to people of a given major political party.
But presumably capitalism would save us from discrimination against such large swaths of economically empowered people?
-
-
Unless there was a long history/deep-seated motivation for discrimination? In which case it would fall under (a).
-
But this assumes that there is a predominant deep-seated motivation for discrimination today.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Honestly in most (if not all) places in the US anti discrimination laws probably are not necessary as they once were in my opinion. If I was
-
told a business wouldn't take my money because (insert reason here) I'd go somewhere else. Today that's not hard (at least in most places)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.