Not whether, why. If they choose based on sexual orientation, that's pretty shitty. If they choose based on fascist-or-not...
-
Imo, the government should intervene in the case of a) historical disadvantage/disenfranchisement, b) major quality-of-life effects.
Democrats (or Republicans) would never fall under (a), but could fall under (b) if, for example, every grocery store in a given area...
-
-
refuses service to people of a given major political party.
-
But presumably capitalism would save us from discrimination against such large swaths of economically empowered people?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.