and let's be real: what these phrases mean is "the predominant attitude within a given population." We all know that, we just choose not to.
-
-
have you ever heard anybody say "black people don't vote for Republicans"? "White men can't jump"? "Women can't drive"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
what's the difference between those three phrases? The first is a) accurate, and b) value neutral.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the second two are neither accurate (they do not predominate in the population) nor value neutral.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
her statement about white people is accurate, but not value neutral. So our real debate is: when is it appropriate to make an accurate...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
but not value-neutral statement about the assumptions that predominate in a given population. Some say, if it's accurate, say it!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
others say, if it's not value-neutral, don't say it! I say, we should contextualize.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
if your non-value-neutral generalization is going to play into ideas that are actively causing misery and death, try your best to avoid it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
if, instead, it's just a wake-up call that isn't going to affect anybody's ability to eat, drink, breathe, live or be treated like a human?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
if it's JUST going to make people feel bad, no material consequences? Then yeah, go ahead and say it. And avoid disingenuous arguments...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
about whether or not a generalization automatically pertains to ALL rather than "what is predominant within the population."
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.