And again my issue is not with anybody disagreeing! "Observed differences are due significantly to biology" is intellectually respectable/
My argument is, the objective standard, like all of reality, cannot be accessed directly by any of us.
-
-
So ascertaining morality is a matter of having a sensitive empathy "instrument," + good facts on how suffering happens...
-
+ wisdom to ascertaining right action (i.e. What action will reduce suffering, or maximize "flourishing" if you want a positive definition.)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.