the feminist position is that observed differences stem from socialization, not biology. Not that no differences exist. Please be serious.
-
-
Replying to @csilverandgold @laurenduca
Fortunately there are decades of data and peer reviewed papers backing up the average differences and the position of evolutionary biology.
3 replies 1 retweet 43 likes -
Replying to @jeffersonianguy @laurenduca
Okay, sure! But please address the argument that is being made. Vanishingly few feminists argue that there are "inherent" traits at play...
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
but rather that men and women have divergent experiences in our society that is heavily influenced by ideas about gender.
6 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
So her argument is...women are socialized to be less militaristic?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
maybe! But usually the core argument of identity politics is intellectual humility, as such:
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sonny_roark16 and
1. Experience constrains our ability to understand/theorize 2. We are better at leading those we understand
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sonny_roark16 and
3. Therefore, men, for example, will do a less-good job leading women, all things being equal, than would another woman.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sonny_roark16 and
(Because women share experiences men do not)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @csilverandgold @sonny_roark16 and
4. As such, we should aim for diversity in our leadership, because different experiences = different "areas of expertise" if you will.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Of course, her argument was probably much simpler: a woman can't screw it up as badly as this guy, so we might as well give a woman a shot.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.