She implied things would be different if we elect women. He asked why, because sex has nothing to do with leadership. Nothing wrong w/ that?https://twitter.com/csilverandgold/status/895473169124933632 …
-
the argument there is: women and men have different experiences. Due to living in a culture with strong gender effects, female leaders...
tend to understand women's problems much better than men. As such, it is valuable to have gender parity in leadership.
-
-
Female biology is irrelevant to leadership. The experience of being female, like all experiences, IS relevant to leadership. Duh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.